Objectives ![]()
Class images
|
The Case for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions Despite
Scientific Uncertainty.
(From UNEP.) | |
|
Measuring the "Global Warming Potential" of Greenhouse Gases.
(From UNEP.) | |
|
Slide Presentation: The Greenhouse Effect; Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions,
Concentrations, and Sources; Temperature Data; and Projections of Future GHG
Emissions. | |
|
Tax to Combat Global Warming? |
The global warming potential (GWP) combines the radiative forcing and lifetimes into one index. The GWP is ratio of a function of the radiative forcing and the concentration of a particular gas compared to carbon dioxide. The uncertainties in GWP included:
- estimation of lifetimes
- radiative forcing
- indirect effects (like water vapor from the oxidation of methane)
- choosing the appropriate time interval
The GWP doesn't take into account the future emissions but the emissions now.As far as GWP CO2 is the most dominant greenhouse gas. CO2 accounts for 98% of the total mass of greenhouse gases and 61% of the radiative forcing. Methane and CFC-12 are the next most important gases for GWP.
Because the GWP takes into account the radiative forcing and the lifetimes of greenhouse gases, it allows us to make rational judgments based on science and not emotion.
We looked at 4 different scenarios based on changes in human activity with respect to greenhouse gases. The scenarios range from the business as usual scenario to one where there would be dramatic changes in our sources of energy. In looking at the chart of the scenarios, the following comments were made:
The graphical representations of the chart data puts this into perspective.- Scenario A: By the year 2100 we would see an increase in radiative forcing that would be 100 times the impact of natural variability (due the sun and volcanos)
- Scenario B: We would see significant reductions with little impact on our lifestyle
- Scenario C: This scenario would offer only a marginal increase in reductions over scenario B
- Scenario D: Is this worth the pain and expense?
In class we talked about how GWP is an important tool for making scientific, rational decisions as to what course of action we take in the future with regard to greenhouse gases.
|
Houghton, J. T., L. G. Meira Filho, B. A. Callander N. Harris,
A. Kattenberg, and K. Maskell, 1996: Climate Change 1995. The Science of Climate Change.
Cambridge University Press, 21-26. |